Maxwell-Schrodinger system: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Marco Frasca (talk | contribs) m Maxwell equations were not correct |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<center><math> iu_t = D_j u D_j u / 2 + A_0 a\,</math></center> | <center><math> iu_t = D_j u D_j u / 2 + A_0 a\,</math></center> | ||
<center><math> | <center><math>\partial^aF_{ab} = J_b\,</math></center> | ||
where the current density <math>J_b\,</math> is given by | where the current density <math>J_b\,</math> is given by |
Revision as of 13:08, 24 July 2007
Maxwell-Schrodinger system in Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle R^3}
This system is a partially non-relativistic analogue of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system, coupling a U(1) connection Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle A_a\,} with a complex scalar field u; it is thus an example of a wave-Schrodinger system. The Lagrangian density is
giving rise to the system of PDE
where the current density Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle J_b\,} is given by
As with the MKG system, there is a gauge invariance for the connection; one can place A in the Lorentz, Coulomb, or Temporal gauges (other choices are of course possible).
Let us place u in Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle H^s\,} , and A in Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle H^\sigma H^{sigma-1}\,.} The lack of scale invariance makes it difficult to exactly state what the critical regularity would be, but it seems to be Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s = \sigma = 1/2\,.}
- In the Lorentz and Temporal gauges, one has LWP for Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s \ge 5/3\,}
and Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s-1 \le \sigma \le s+1, (5s-2)/3}
[NkrWad-p]
- For smooth data (Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s=\sigma > 5/2\,} ) in the Lorentz gauge this is in NkTs1986 (this result works in all dimensions)
- Global weak solutions are known in the energy class (Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle s=\sigma=1\,} ) in the Lorentz and Coulomb gauges GuoNkSr1996. GWP is still open however.
- Modified wave operators have been constructed in the Coulomb gauge in the case of vanishing magnetic field in [GiVl-p3], [GiVl-p5]. No smallness condition is needed on the data at infinity.
- A similar result for small data is in Ts1993
- In one dimension, GWP in the energy class is known Ts1995
- In two dimensions, GWP for smooth solutions is known TsNk1985